Nix vs dxo photolab 2 pro#
The seven plug-ins that have been updated are Analog Efex Pro for analog film simulation, Color Efex Pro for color correction and effects, Dfine for noise reduction, HDR Efex Pro for high-dynamic range photography, Sharpener Pro for enhancing finer details, Silver Efex Pro for black and white images, and finally Viveza for adjusting color and tone in a specific area rather than the entire image DxO Labs stepped in to save the plug-ins by purchasing the collection from Google, then spent six months updating code that hadn’t been touched in years. The company announced the end of the Nik collection last year, when the plug-ins, at the time, were already no longer fully compatible with Photoshop. But after making the plug-ins free in 2016, Google stopped updating them. Google originally acquired the Nik Collection in 2012 with the purchase of Nik Software, the company also behind Snapseed.
Nix vs dxo photolab 2 update#
The update doesn’t exactly add anything new to the Nik collection, but it does bring the set of seven plug-ins back from the dead.
Nix vs dxo photolab 2 software#
The company says it expects to leave bankruptcy in a few months after refocusing on the software and reorganizing the company. Several of the Nik features are also migrating into DxO PhotoLab, which also sees an update today as version 1.2 adds U-Point technology for local adjustments.īoth updates come as DxO Labs faces bankruptcy and refocuses the company on four software programs while discontinuing the DxO One camera. The Nik Collection is no longer nixed - on Wednesday, June 6, DxO Labs launched the Nik Collection 2018 by DxO, a bug-squashing and compatibility update for the Photoshop and Lightroom plug-ins long favorited by photographers. Yes, and it lets you use higher shutter speeds, or a smaller aperture, for greater DoF. Shooting a much higher ISO would definitely be nice for early morning and late afternoon shooting. I'll shoot some higher ISO images late this afternoon and post for you. For example, when I upgraded to PL4, I was able to use DeepPRIME on older raw images going back more than 15 years. Why do you delete your raw files? You should always retain them (obviously only the keepers), as it gives you the opportunity to reprocess later, using better software or simply if your skills improve. Right now I am primarily shooting nature images and do not keep my RAW files after my conversion. With only PRIME, I was more limited.ĭo you have an image that you regard as particularly noisy, for us to try? I even go up to ISO6400 with my 1" sensor cameras, knowing that DeepPRIME will handle them well. But the effect is greater at ISOs greater than 800. I have a number of 1" sensor cameras, and use DeepPRIME on every image. Maybe you could provide a raw example of a particularly noisy image of yours, and we can see what difference DeepPRIME could make? Does the significant difference still apply? PL4 introduced DeepPRIME, which is much better than HQ and PRIME with very noisy images. For noise reduction only, is DxO 4 considerly better than DxO 2?
0 kommentar(er)
